An analysis of how the author gains the sympathy of the reader in "Shooting an Elephant," by George Orwell

In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell finds himself in a difficult postal service involving an elephant. The deal of the elephant lies in his hands. Only he posterior stick out the final decision. In the end, refer satisfactory to Orwells decision, the elephant lay dying in a pool of blood. Orwell wins the sympathy of readers by expressing the pressure he feels as an Anglo-Indian in Burma, fight with his morals, and showing a instinct of compassion for the dying animal. Readers realise with Orwell because they can tie in to his emotions in the moments before the retrieveing. Being the etiolate leader, he should have been fitted to carry an independent decision, but was influenced by the natives (Orwell 101). Orwell describes his feelings about being pressured to learn the elephant: Here I was the fresh man with his gun, standing in presence of the unarmed crowd - plainly the leading actor of the recite; but in naturalism I was only an absurd wildcat well pushed to and fro by the will of those yellowish faces behind (101). Every one(a) has been in a patch in which he or she has been expected to be a leader. For opposer reasons people are looked to as leaders, sometimes because of their race, ethnicity, or heritage.

In this case, Orwell was take care as a leader because he was British and he worked for the British Empire. Readers are able to relate to the fact that he does not want to be humiliated in front of the Burmese. He declares, Every clean-living mans life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at (101). Orwell compares the elephant to the huge British Empire, and just as the elephant has lost control, he feels that when the white man turns despot it is his own freedom... If you want to get a full essay, smart set it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.