HARM REDUCTION : NEEDLE EXCHANGEIntroductionNeedle transposition programs be appropriate with a mis spend reduction approach to endovenous medical specialty use management . Intravenous medicine use is prudential for the spread of infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency computer virus (HIV , hepatitis B and hepatitis C . A somewhatwhat divisive doting policy chevy change programs are intended to throw the spread of infectious diseases by supplying the medicate injecting republic with sterile hassles and injecting equipment . This takes a f behaveual approach to the issue and considers the scan that supports and opposes the equipment casualty reduction approach . It should be noted that this considers solely acerate leaf exchange programs and not the highly controversial of full injecting rooms . The concludes by offering a personal stomach of the issue , based on the evidence presentedPros of needle exchange programsReducing the spread of infectious diseaseInfectious diseases including HIV and hepatitis are prevalent in intravenous dose substance abusers because of high risk injecting pr transactionices including sharing needles and administering injections in an unsterile environment . The Center for Disease Control (CDC , the National amount of Health (NIH ) and the World Health Organization (WHO endorse needle exchange programs because they have been shown to reduce high risk injecting behaviors by up to 74 (World Health Organization 2004 . The reduction in high risk injection behaviors as a outgo of needle exchange programs is the trail reason that in Australia mingled with 1991 and 2000 , well-nigh 25 ,000 impertinent cases of HIV and 21 ,000 bare-ass cases of hepatitis C were prevented (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005 . Such significant public h ealth benefits are the principal reason need! le exchange programs are back up by governments in countries including Australia , Brazil , Canada , the Netherlands and the United KingdomProviding access to health and neighborly servicesA second advantage of needle exchange programs is that they act as gateways to traditional medical treatments for drug dependence for some clients .
Prior to participating in needle exchange programs , a high proportion of drug-injecting clients have never been in do with health or companionable services . Studies have shown that impudent injectors are more likely to enter rehabilitation programs compared to injectors whose drug use has been long-term (Hacker et al , 2005 . Providing exposure to health and brotherly services early in an intravenous drug user s substance abuse history is another linchpin in the argument for needle exchange programsArguments against harm minimisationEncouraging drug useDetractors of the harm reduction approach argue that needle exchange programs and facilities actively promote drug use by providing drug injecting equipment . It is as well argued that needle exchange facilities create a upright clash spot for intravenous drug users and contribute to alter the social net incomes of users , thereby increasing the prevalence of intravenous drug use (Small , Palepu Tyndall , 2006 . The weight of scientific evidence suggests that these arguments are fallacious and that needle exchange programs do not bring forward social network formation and do not amplification recruitment of injecting drug users (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005Represent a weakening of anti-drug policy...If you want to apprehend a extensive essay, order it on ou r website: Order! Essay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.